Sunan Abi Dawud, 2265

Rapporté par Amr b. Shu’aib, d’après son père, d’après son grand-père رضي الله عنه : Le Prophète ﷺ a jugé, à propos d’un enfant reconnu comme membre d’une famille après la mort de son père, auquel il était attribué lorsque les héritiers disaient qu’il était des leurs, que s’il était l’enfant d’une esclave que le père possédait au moment du rapport, il était inclus parmi ceux qui demandaient son intégration, mais il ne recevait rien de l’héritage déjà partagé ; il recevait seulement la part de l’héritage qui n’avait pas encore été partagée. Mais si le père auquel il était attribué l’avait renié, il n’était pas inclus parmi les héritiers. Si c’était l’enfant d’une esclave que le père ne possédait pas ou d’une femme libre avec qui il avait eu des rapports illicites, il n’était pas inclus parmi les héritiers et n’héritait pas, même si celui à qui il était attribué réclamait la paternité, car il était un enfant de la fornication, que sa mère soit libre ou esclave

Amr b. Shu'aib on his father's authority said that his grandfather reported:The Prophet (ﷺ) decided regarding one who was treated as a member of a family after the death of his father, to whom he was attributed when the heirs said he was one of them, that if he was the child of a slave-woman whom the father owned when he had intercourse with her, he was included among those who sought his inclusion, but received none of the inheritance which was previously divided; he, however, received his portion of the inheritance which had not already been divided; but if the father to whom he was attributed had disowned him, he was not joined to the heirs. If he was a child of a slave-woman whom the father did not possess or of a free woman with whom he had illicit intercourse, he was not joined to the heirs and did not inherit even if the one to whom he was attributed is the one who claimed paternity, since he was a child of fornication whether his mother was free or a slave