Sahih Muslim, 3613

A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported:Sa'd b. Abu Waqqas and Abd b. Zam'a (Allah be pleased with them) disputed with each other over a young boy. Sa'd said: Messenger of Allah, he is the son of my brother 'Utba b. Abu Waqqas as he made it explicit that he was his son. Look at his resemblance. Abd b. Zam'a said Messenger of Allah, he is my brother as he was born on the bed of my father from his slave-girl. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) looked at his resemblance and found a clear resemblance with 'Utba. (But) he said: "He is yours O 'Abd (b. Zam'a), for the child is to be attributed to one on whose bed it is born, and stoning for a fornicator. Sauda bint Zam'a, O you should observe veil from him." So he did not see Sauda at all. Muhammad b. Rumh did not make a mention (of the words): "O Abd

Rapporté par Aïcha رضي الله عنها : Sa’d ibn Abu Waqqas et Abd ibn Zam’a رضي الله عنهما se disputaient au sujet d’un jeune garçon. Sa’d a dit : « Ô Messager d’Allah, c’est le fils de mon frère ‘Utba ibn Abu Waqqas, car il l’a reconnu comme son fils. Regarde sa ressemblance. » Abd ibn Zam’a a dit : « Ô Messager d’Allah, c’est mon frère, car il est né sur le lit de mon père de sa servante. » Le Messager d’Allah ﷺ a observé la ressemblance et a constaté qu’il ressemblait clairement à ‘Utba. Mais il a dit : « Il est à toi, ô ‘Abd (ibn Zam’a), car l’enfant appartient à celui sur le lit duquel il est né, et pour le fornicateur, il y a la lapidation. Sauda bint Zam’a, voile-toi devant lui. » Ainsi, il ne vit jamais Sauda. Muhammad ibn Rumh n’a pas mentionné les mots : « Ô Abd. »